QUOTE(robert @ Jul 19 2006, 05:43 PM) [snapback]112135[/snapback]
Foreigners can be business owners in the U.S. There are tax withholding implications, however. (Hence, definitely talk to a CPA.) I believe the tax rates are more favorable here than in Canada.
Actually, Over the last few years Canadian Tax rates for corporations have become far better than in the US. A US Corporation pays a federal tax of 15% on the first $50,000 of net profit, and in Canada it is 15% on the First $250,000 in net profit, even with the exchange rate that is still a deal. There are specific rules as to ownership for that tax rate.
So lets add practical application to this.
If they incorporate the business In Canada, and the US partner creates a separate corporation in the US, And the US corporation invoices the Canadian Corp for service, or licensing, or inventory (depending on the type of commerce they do), then up to $300,000 is tax at only 15%. Or if they made a taxable amount of $100k, and werew even partners each would end up at $42,500, net spendable (not including State and or Province taxes).
How many of you business owners can claim a total tax rate of 15% on $300k or even $100k? Before responding consider that in all your pass through entities you also have to pay Self employment taxes of 15.3%. So my first criteria: "IF you are going to be profitable". . . not: "the corproation will automatically create untold wealth. . . "
As far as respect as a business goes, how many of you have applied for a loan through your LLC or Sub-S and had the bank NOT Require personal tax returns, financial statements, personal guarantee, AND still consider you high risk raising your interest rate a few basis points. Again, don't jump over the edge in your hyper excited state and say that you had a friend that had a corporation and still had to do that. That is absolutely true, but as a real corporation that can change, as a pseudo sole proprietor, it never will.
That is also true in the reverse, as a Passthrough income person, you will always be required to include your entire business profile (at least 2 years of tax returns, financial statements, etc) for a personal loan. On the other hand, if you were a w-2 employee of a corporation, what do you need to qualify for a loan? Your w-2 and two to three months of pay stubs. Which of these will get a better interest rate, all other things being equal?
Back to the original post:
"As of now, we simply have an undefined partnership"
Can we all agree that is bad?
"If I were to file as an LLP or LLC in the states, how does that impact my partner's taxes in Canada?"For you, you will file taxes as if you were a sole proprietor. For your partner, His would be subject to 30% US withholding and due to tax treaties, he would get full credit of that 30% against his Canadian Taxes.
"The company is completely based online, so we have no central location on where to base the business. We just want to make sure that we are able to divide profits 50/50 and not suffer from tax disadvantages because of our different locations."[i]
State and provicial taxes can have a huge impact on the bottom line, Since you are not physically tied to any state, if you operate as a real corporation, you could eliminate state taxes through good choices. As a pass through, you have no choice.
Still offended? I just didn't want to waste the time bandwidth or server resources if no one was interested, by the number of posts it appears you are.
Oh yeah the liability statement. First Corporations have been around longer than the Constitution. We know how they are treated in the courts. If we look at the genesis of the LLC, we find it was developed to replace the LP which failed in court to limit liability. "But wait, the LP was DESIGNED to limit liability, the Statutes, the Marketing hype, the brochures all said the LP was a liability protection vehicle!!? What happened? It got tested. . . by the courts, it failed. Precedence setting case, Kroc v. Tupper. Oops, that didn't work, let's try something else. How about an LLC we'll CLAIM the liability protection of a real corporation, but retain the pass through aspects of the LP. Hurray, we've done it. "new and improved" is the way to go." you might want to look at Water Waste and Land v. Lanham. "Fear not fellow citizens the great and powerful OZ has just created the new LLP, which really will protect you form the wicked witch of the court. Well MAybe the LLLP (Limited Liability Limited Partnership) is the best answer."
If any of these worked there would not be generation 2, 3, 4,. . .72,. . . Lets look back. the LLC marketing materials claim the liability protection of the real corporation. Well isn't that flattering (Imitation is the highest form of flattery).
I'm not selling, just trying to clear out the legacy misinformation that is constantly regurgitated on the net.